Amazon Quick Linker

Disable Copy Paste

Free Fiction Writing Tips: Where Modern and Classic Writing Crafts Collide


Header

Liquid Story Binder XE by Black Obelisk Software

Sunday, April 23, 2023

The Writing of the Short Story by Lewis Worthington Smith

The Writing of the Short Story by Lewis Worthington Smith

THE WRITING OF THE

SHORT STORY


BY



LEWIS WORTHINGTON SMITH, A.M.


DRAKE UNIVERSITY, DES MOINES, IOWA




D. C. HEATH & CO., PUBLISHERS
BOSTON NEW YORK CHICAGO

Copyright, 1902,
By D. C. Heath & Co.

It is a pleasure
to be permitted to associate
with this little book
the name of my friend
Professor L. A. Sherman
of the University of Nebraska.


 

FOREWORD


The Writing of the Short Story by Lewis Worthington Smith is a captivating exploration into the art and craft of creating compelling narratives in a condensed form. This book serves as a comprehensive guide, offering aspiring writers and enthusiasts a treasure trove of knowledge, insights, and practical advice on mastering the complexities of the short story.

Lewis Worthington Smith, a seasoned author and distinguished writing instructor, brings his wealth of experience and passion for storytelling to the forefront of this remarkable work. With each chapter, he unveils the intricacies of crafting memorable characters, establishing evocative settings, and constructing powerful plots within the constraints of brevity. Smith's expertise shines through his articulate prose as he escorts readers through the labyrinth of short story writing, shedding light on the techniques, nuances, and subtleties necessary for success.

One of the greatest strengths of this book lies in Smith's ability to demystify the creative process. As readers delve into the pages, they will discover a treasure trove of practical exercises, writing prompts, and engaging examples that elucidate the principles discussed. Smith's approachable style and genuine desire to nurture talent make this book an invaluable resource for both beginners and seasoned writers alike.

Moreover, Smith's thorough exploration of various literary techniques encourages readers to experiment and expand their creative boundaries. He adeptly delves into the significance of plot structure, character development, dialogue, and point of view, empowering writers to harness these elements to craft compelling narratives that resonate with readers.

The Writing of the Short Story is not merely a theoretical treatise; it is a roadmap to success for writers seeking to make their mark in the world of short fiction. Through its pages, Smith emphasizes the importance of honing one's storytelling skills, fostering an authentic voice, and embracing the art of revision. He guides readers toward navigating the challenges that arise in the writing process and instills the confidence necessary to overcome these obstacles.

As a reader, you are about to embark on a journey that will not only transform your understanding of short story writing but will also inspire you to embrace the medium's unique potential. Whether you are an aspiring writer looking to refine your skills, a reader curious about the creative process, or a teacher seeking to impart knowledge to your students, The Writing of the Short Story will undoubtedly be an indispensable companion on your literary odyssey.

In closing, I am honored to introduce you to Lewis Worthington Smith's The Writing of the Short Story. Within these pages, you will find a wellspring of wisdom, guidance, and inspiration that will undoubtedly ignite your passion for storytelling and propel your journey towards becoming a master of the short story form. Embrace the knowledge presented here, let your imagination run wild, and set forth on the exhilarating path of crafting captivating tales.

Happy writing!
 
Olivia Salter
04/23/2023 




SUGGESTIONS FOR TEACHERS

In the author's classes the three stories in the volume entitled "Three Hundred Dollars" are first studied because of their simplicity, and these are followed by parts of "The Bonnie Brier Bush," and then by the stories from Bret Harte. Mrs. Phelps Ward's "Loveliness" is especially valuable for illustrating methods and devices for making a simple theme dramatically interesting. Students are required to mark stories with the symbols and discuss them with reference to the principles of which this little book is an exposition, but no recitation on the book itself is required. Perhaps one-third of the time in the class-room is spent in discussion of the short themes written by the class, and when convenient these are placed on the board before the class for that purpose. In the theme work following the suggested subjects the effort is made to confine instruction and practice to one thing at a time, but at the conclusion of the work of the term each member of the class is required to hand in a complete original story.


WRITING OF THE SHORT STORY


Narrative Forms

1. Elements of the Story.—This little volume is meant to be a discussion of but one of the various forms that literature takes, and it will be first in order to see what are the elements that go to the making of a narrative having literary quality. A story may be true or false, but we shall here be concerned primarily with fiction, and with fiction of no great length. In writing of this sort the first essential is that something shall happen; a story without a succession of incidents of some kind is inconceivable. We may then settle upon incident as a first element. As a mere matter of possibility a story may be written without any interest other than that of incident, but a story dealing with men will not have much interest for thoughtful readers unless it also includes some showing of character. Further, as the lives of all men and women are more or less conditioned by their surroundings and circumstance, any story will require more or less description. Incidents are of but little moment, character showing may have but slight interest, description is purposeless, unless the happenings of the story develop in the characters feelings toward which we assume some attitude of sympathy or opposition. Including this fourth element of the story, we shall then have incident, description, character, mood, as the first elements of the narrative form.

2. A Succession of Incidents Required.—A series of unconnected happenings may be interesting merely from the unexpectedness—or the hurry and movement of the events, but ordinarily a story gains greatly in its appeal to the reader through having its separate incidents developed in some sort of organic unity. The handling of incidents for a definite effect gives what we call plot. A plot should work steadily forward to the end or dรฉnouement, and should yet conceal that end in order that interest may be maintained to the close. Evidently a writer who from the first has in mind the outcome of his story will subordinate the separate incidents to that main purpose and so in that controlling motive give unity to the whole plot. Further, the interest in the plot will be put on a higher plane, if in the transition from incident to incident there is seen, not chance simply, but some relation of cause and effect. When the unfolding of the plot is thus orderly in its development, the reader feels his kindling interest going forward to the outcome with a keener relish because of the quickening of thought, as well as of emotion, in piecing together the details that arouse a glow of satisfaction.

3. The Character Interest.—We can hardly have any vital interest in a story apart from an interest in the characters. It is because things happen to them, because we are glad of their good fortune or apprehensive of evil for them, that the incidents in their succession gain importance in our emotions. We are concerned with things that affect our lives, and secondarily with things that affect the lives of others, since what touches the fortunes of others is but a part of that complex web of destiny and environment in which our own lives are enmeshed. In the story it is not so true as in the drama that, for the going out of our sympathies toward the hero or the heroine, there should be other contrasting characters; but a story gains color and movement from having a variety of individualities. Especially if the story is one of action, definite sympathies are heightened when they are accompanied by emotional antagonisms. In "The Master of Ballantrae," we come to take sides with Henry Durrie almost wholly through having found his rival, the Master, so black a monster. Such establishment of a common bond of interest between us and the character with whom our sympathies are to be engaged is a most effective means of holding us to a personal involvement in the development of the plot. There must not be too many characters shown, the relations between them must not be too various or too complexly conflicting, but where the interplay of feeling and clashing motives is not too hard to grasp, a variety of characters gives life and warmth of human interest to a story.

4. Uses of Description.—Inasmuch as there are other interests in our lives than those which are established by our relations with our fellows, interests connected with the material world about us, any narrative will probably have occasion to include some description. It may be necessary merely as an aid to our understanding of some of the details upon which the plot turns, it may help us to realize the personalities of the characters, and it is often useful in creating background and atmosphere, giving us some of the feelings of those with whom the story deals as they look upon the beauty, or the gray dullness, of the changing panorama of their lives. Stevenson's description of the "old sea-dog" in "Treasure Island" is an excellent illustration of the effectiveness of a few lines of description in making us know something very definite in the man.

"I remember him as if it were yesterday, as he came plodding to the inn door, his sea-chest following behind him in a handbarrow, a tall, strong, heavy, nut-brown man; his hands ragged and scarred, with black, broken nails, and the saber cut across one cheek, a lurid white."

5. Rossetti in "The Bride's Prelude," a story in verse, after merely glancing at the opening of the tale, devotes eight stanzas to description introduced for the purpose of background and atmosphere. Two of them are given here.

"Within the window's heaped recess The light was counterchanged In blent reflexes manifold From perfume caskets of wrought gold And gems the bride's hair could not hold
"All thrust together: and with these A slim-curved lute, which now, At Amelotte's sudden passing there, Was swept in some wise unaware, And shook to music the close air."

This helps us to enter into the life and spirit of the time and place, to conceive imaginatively the likings, the desires, the passions, the purposes, and the powers that shall be potent in the story.

6. Kinds of Description.—Description is primarily of two kinds, that which is to give accurate information, and that which is to produce a definite impression not necessarily involving exactness of imagery. The first of these forms is useful simply in the way of explanation, serving the first purpose indicated in paragraph four. The second is useful for other purposes than that of exposition, often appealing incidentally to our sense of the beautiful, and requiring always nice literary skill in its management. It should be borne in mind always that literary description must not usurp the office of representations of the material in the plastic arts. It should not be employed as an end in itself, but only as subsidiary to other ends.

7. Various Moods as Incidents.—The moods in the characters of a story and their changes are connected with the incidents of the story, since they are in part happenings, and with the characters, since they reveal character. Apart from direct statement of them, we understand the moods of the actors in the little drama which we are made to imagine is being played before us from the things they say, from the things they do, and from gestures, attitudes, movements, which the author visualizes for us. If these moods are not made clear to us or we cannot see that they are natural, definite reactions from previous happenings in accord with character, we do not have a sense of organic unity in the narrative. We become confused in trying to establish the dependence of incident and feeling upon something preceding, and our interest flags. Everything that happens in a well-told story gives us feelings which we look to find in those whom the happenings affect in the tale, feelings which should call forth some sort of responsive action for our satisfaction. Clearly, if the characters are cold, if we cannot find in them moods of the kind and intensity that to us seem warranted, the story will be a disappointment.


Literary Divisions and General Principles

8. The Conceptual and Emotional.—Theoretically all writing is divided easily into two classes, conceptual and emotional, the literature of thought and the literature of feeling. In the actual attempt to classify written composition on this basis, however, no sharp distinction can be maintained. Even matters of fact, certainly such matters of fact as we care to write about, are of more or less moment to us; we cannot deal with them in a wholly unemotional way. In our daily lives we are continually reaching conclusions that differ from the conclusions reached by others about the same matters of fact, and are trying to make these matters of fact have the same value for others that they have for us. This is true of our business life as well as of our social and home life. It always will be so. It is doubtless true that if our knowledge of matters of fact embraced a knowledge of the universe, and if the experience of each of us were just like that of his fellow and included all possible experience, we might reach identical conclusions. This is not true and never can be true. It is in effect true of a small portion of the things about which we think,—the addition of one to two makes three for every one,—but outside of these things, writing need not be and seldom is purely conceptual.

9. Subject-matter.—Various as are the things about which we write and manifold as are our interests in them, they may be classified for our purposes under four heads: Matters of Fact, Experience, Beauty, Truth. Again, we shall find difficulty in separating each of these from each of the others. Some of our experiences have certainly been revelations of matters of fact; without our experiences, we should hardly have acquired any real sense of the beautiful; save for them we could not have known anything of truth. No accurate definition of these things carefully distinguishing between them can be attempted here. It may be assumed that what is meant by matters of fact will be understood without definition. As we read the story in great measure for the purpose of enlarging our experience, this part of our possible literary material is worth considering further. In the child we are able to detect very early a growing curiosity. That curiosity does not disappear when the child has grown from boy to man; he is still asking questions of the universe, still trying to piece the fragments of his knowledge into a law-ordered and will-ordered whole. What he knows has been the product of experience, what he may yet know further must be the product of experience. This experience may not all be personal, but even that which he gets at second hand is so far useful in helping him toward that understanding of the universe for which he hopes. He never will reach that understanding, all his experience will make but a fraction of things to be known matters of fact to him; and yet a deathless interest in the scarcely recognized belief that the facts and forces of which he has known have some unifying principle makes his emotions quicken at every new experience that may have possible significance.

10. Appeal of Experience, Beauty, and Truth.—It will be evident, then, that experience which somehow makes the impression of superior importance may be presented inorganically and yet gain an interested hearing. The method of creating this impression, whether through the appearance of conviction in the writer or by various literary[8] devices, need not detain us here. We shall be concerned merely with noting that the possible relation of the particular to the general, of this experience to the whole of experience, makes it a thing of moment. In just what way experience develops in us the sense of the beautiful, just what it is in anything that makes us distinguish beauty in it, cannot now be determined. It will be enough for us to know that literature makes a large appeal to a sense of the beautiful in us, a sense not fortuitous and irrational, though varying, but normal and almost universal, dependent upon natural laws of development. Truth is also difficult of definition, but we may understand that when out of experience, as through a process of reasoning, we have reached a conclusion that is something more than a matter of fact, a conclusion touching our emotions and having vital spiritual interest to us, the experience, whether our own directly or at second hand, has brought us to a truth. Truth is, perhaps, that matter of fact of universal intelligence that transcends the matter of fact of the finite mind.

11. Literary Principles and Qualities.—There are some fundamental principles of literary presentation which we may briefly review here. All our study of science, and in a less obvious fashion, of all the physical, social, and artistic world about us, is more or less an attempt to classify, simplify, and unify facts whose relations we do not see at a glance. We must observe and learn the facts first, but they will be of no great utility to us as unrelated items of knowledge. The need of establishing some sort of law and order in our understanding of the mass of phenomena of which we must take cognizance is so insistent that we early acquire the habit of attempting to hold in mind any new fact through its relation to some[9] other fact or facts. In other words, we can retain the knowledge we acquire only by making one fact do duty for a great many other facts included in it. Our writing must not violate what is at once a necessity and a pleasure of the mind. Unity, simplicity, coherence, harmony, or congruity, must all be sought as essential qualities of any writing. We must also indicate our sense of the relative values of the things with which we deal by a proper selection of details for presentation, a careful subordination of the less important to the more important through the proportion of space and attention given to each, and through other devices for securing emphasis. Let us keep in mind value, selection, subordination, proportion, emphasis, as a second group of terms for principles involved in writing. We may also wish to give our subject further elements of appeal through what may be suggested beyond the telling, through the melody and rhythm of the words, or through a quickening of the sense of the beautiful. Suggestion, melody, rhythm, beauty, are to be included, then, in a third group of qualities that may contribute to the effectiveness of what we write.

12. Conceptual Writing.—Of the literary qualities that have just been discussed, only the first group is perhaps essential to what has been designated as conceptual writing. Here we may place expository writing on subjects wholly matter of fact, mathematical discussions, scientific treatises largely, though not necessarily, and other writing of like character. As unity is the quality of importance here, we may well consider the units of discourse. Our first unit is that of the whole composition, the second that of the paragraph, and the third that of the sentence. Which of these is the prime unit, as the dollar is the prime unit of our[10] medium of exchange, may not be evident at once; but if we examine the writing of clear thinkers carefully, without attempting to settle the matter in any doctrinaire fashion, we shall find that the paragraph, and not the sentence, is the more unified whole. I turn to Cardinal Newman, and in the middle of a paragraph find the sentence, "This should be carefully observed," a sentence meaningless when taken from the context. As a part of the paragraph it has a function, but it is certainly as a unit of detail and not as a prime unit. A writer like Carlyle makes these lesser units more important, but they are still subordinate to their use in the paragraph. In all our writing we shall do much for the unity, simplicity, and coherence of our work by seeing to it that our paragraphs are properly arranged and that each fulfills this function of a prime unit in the composition.

13. The Sense of Value.—When, in addition to statement of mere matters of fact, an author wishes to impress his readers with his own sense of the importance and the value of what he has to say, or of some special phase of his subject, he will employ the principles of the second group spoken of in a preceding paragraph. They cannot be ignored, indeed, in explanation of the simplest matters of fact, but a writer who means to convince and persuade will make more use of them. His personality will express itself in the selection of details and in the emphasis he places upon one detail or another. Among the literary forms which, besides being conceptual, are also concerned with persuasion, we find the oration, the essay, a great deal of business correspondence, and much of what we read in magazines and newspapers.

14. Writing having Artistic Quality.—When in addition to expressing matters of fact or truth, appealing perhaps to experience, we wish to arouse some sense of the beautiful and the artistic, we shall give our writing some or all of the qualities of the third group. Evidently, writing of this sort is in many respects the most difficult, since the writer must have regard for unity and the related principles, as well as for the qualities which peculiarly distinguish it. Experience, beauty, and truth are all available as subject-matter, and all the principles governing literary composition are concerned. Here we shall find the poem, the drama, the oration in some of its forms, most essays of the better sort, the greater part of good critical writing, literary description, and all narrative forms except the matter-of-fact historical writing of unliterary scholars.

15. Two Things Requisite in Writing.—It is to be borne in mind that the foregoing classifications are by no means absolute. Gardiner in his "Forms of Prose Literature" says very truly that the "essential elements, not only of literature, but of all the fine arts, are: first, an organic unity of conception; and second, the pervasive personality of the artist." It is true that much of our writing does not aspire to literary character, but in very little of our writing of any sort can we afford to neglect the first of these elements, and in very little of it do we care to leave the second out of account. Even in exposition of the simpler sort we may give to our writing the distinction of a more luminous style and the stronger appeal of a warmer personal interest, if we shape it into organic unity and make evident in it "the pervasive personality of the artist."

 

Read the rest below.



The PDF might take a minute to load. Or, click to download PDF.

If your Web browser is not configured to display PDF files. No worries, just click here to download the PDF file.

Saturday, April 22, 2023

Writing Prompt: Music Hath Charms

Writing Prompt

 Writing Prompt: Music Hath Charms

 

These exercises were written by IWW members and administrators to provide structured practice opportunities for its members. You are welcome to use them for practice as well. Please mention that you found them at the Internet Writers Workshop

 

 ____________

 

Exercise: In 400 words or less, create a scene in which you describe some kind of music and the effect it has on a listener or listeners.

-------------------------


In William Congreve's 1697 play, The Mourning Bride, a character says, Music hath charms to soothe the savage breast. (often misquoted as 'savage beast') It's still true. We play a lullaby to put a baby to sleep and a suitor woos his beloved with a serenade. But music can also wake the savage beast within us. Soldiers march off to war to stirring patriotic music. Somber music is played at a traditional funeral, but in New Orleans, a dixieland jazz band sets a lively pace returning from the cemetery. Acid rock, house, hip hop, reggae, or rap can turn an arena into a writhing sea of sweaty bodies. Opera buffs swoon over an aria. Swinging big bands were the sound track to the heartaches and homecomings of WWII.

Music mirrors our culture and society and is a way to travel back in time. Listen to Mozart or Bach, and you are in a different world for a while. Show us a character appreciating, or hating, or being stirred by music, and describe that music so that we will know why the character reacts as he does. The music can be from any place or anywhere—harpsichord, jungle drums, a
shepherd's flute, or a one-stringed Chinese banjo.

-------------------------


In your critique, consider whether the description of the music will help the reader to 'hear' it. Does the author's description make us understand why the character reacts as he/she does? What tools of the writing craft does the author use to evoke the sounds of music—language, pacing, repetition, rhythm, or perhaps comparison to senses other than hearing.

 Some more writing prompts for you to try.

 

Friday, April 21, 2023

Good Versus Good by Randy Ingermanson | Advanced Fiction Writing

Advanced Fiction Writing by Randy Ingermanson

 

Good Versus Good

 

by Randy Ingermanson 

 

Advanced Fiction Writing


Many stories have as their main plot a conflict between “the good guys” and “the bad guys.”

You can think of any number of examples. The Harry Potter series. The Hunger Games series. Just about any mystery or suspense novel. And on and on.

“Good guys” against “bad guys” makes a good story, no doubt about it. But there’s a way to make it better without much effort. Throw in a bit of dissension among the good guys.

So a secondary plot of the story is “good guys” against the other “good guys.”

This makes your story stronger for a couple of reasons:

  • Now your “good guys” have an even tougher problem. They not only have to defeat the “bad guys,” but they’ve first got to also settle the differences among themselves.
  • It introduces the possibility of a genuine moral dilemma in your story. Because the competing groups of “good guys” may have different values that drive them. And now you have to wrestle with which of those competing values is most important.

Just as an example, consider the case of the Harry Potter series. This is definitely a “good guys” versus “bad guys” series.

The “bad guys” are Lord Voldemort and his gang of thugs who want to take over the world and oppress the Muggles.

The “good guys” are the decent witches and wizards who want to leave the Muggles alone.

In book 1 of the series, our hero, Harry Potter, goes off to school at Hogwarts and begins to learn about the magical world he belongs to.

Harry has no idea about the massive battle looming with Voldemort and his minions. Instead, he’s surrounded on all sides by different factions of “good guys.”

For starters, there are four competing houses within the school. Three of these are “good guys”—Harry’s own Gryffindor, along with Ravenclaw and Hufflepuff.

Harry quickly becomes best friends with Ron Weasley, another first-year student, who’s a bit of a goof-off. Ron and Harry find themselves at odds with another first-year, Hermione Granger, who comes off as a stuck-up know-it-all. Eventually, the three become friends, but it takes a troll to bring them together.

There are many cliques within Gryffindor. There are the cool kids, Fred and George Weasley and their friend Lee Jordan.

Then there is Neville Longbottom, nerdy and klutzy and generally a bit weird.

Ron and Fred and George have an unbearably prissy older brother named Percy, who happens to be the prefect of Gryffindor this year, and who makes life miserable for his brothers.

Not to mention Ron Weasley’s very cool older brothers, Bill and Charlie, who’ve already graduated and left behind excellent reputations that Ron can’t hope to match.

Then there’s Oliver Wood, captain of the Quidditch team, who really gets upset when Harry gets himself in trouble and can’t perform up to snuff on the Quidditch field.

And let’s not forget Hagrid, the affable half-giant who loves strange creatures and is secretly raising a baby dragon.

There are a lot of “good guys” here, all competing in different ways. They don’t mean to be making the battle againt the “bad guys” harder.

But that’s exactly what they’re doing.

Near the end of the story, Harry and Hermione sneak out one night to help Hagrid get rid of a baby dragon that’s getting much too big to hide any longer. They succeed in getting the dragon safely rehomed—but then get caught before they can sneak back in to Gryffindor. And caught with them is the bumbling Neville, who sneaked out to try to find them and warn them to get back where they belong. This gets them detention and causes Gryffindor to lose 150 points.

As a result, Harry and Hermione feel the rage of the entire Gryffindor student body. They’re instant pariahs and the whole house treats them with contempt for weeks.

As final exams loom, Harry and Ron and Hermione learn that Lord Voldemort is about to do something terrible. They’ve got to stop him, so they decide to sneak out again late at night.

But first, they’ve got to get past Neville Longbottom, who insists that he’ll fight them before he lets them break the rules yet again.

All of this conflict is “good guys” against “other good guys.” And it makes the story stronger. It makes the battle against the “bad guys” that much harder.

After the dust has settled, the school headmaster, Albus Dumbledore awards points to Harry, Ron, and Hermione, for their courage and wits in battling Voldemort.

And he also awards points to Neville Longbottom. Why? Neville didn’t do anything to fight Voldemort. But as Dumbledore points out, it’s just as hard to stand up to your friends as your enemies. (In my own experience, it’s sometimes harder to stand up to your friends. Peer pressure and all that.) It’s the first courageous thing Neville has ever done, but it won’t be the last. In standing up to his friends, Neville has become a better person. So have Harry, Ron, and Hermione.

The main story in the Harry Potter series is consistently the “good guys” against the “bad guys.” That’s the way it should be in this series. But the story is made so much better by the many, many ways in which the “good guys” are infighting with the other “good guys.”

Homework

  • Is your story a “good guys” versus “bad guys” kind of story?
  • How many conflicts do you have between “good guys” and other “good guys?”
  • Can you add more?
  • Will that make it a better story?

 

About The Author

Randy Ingermanson
Randy Ingermanson is a theoretical physicist and the award-winning author of six novels. He has taught at numerous writing conferences over the years and publishes the free monthly Advanced Fiction Writing E-zine.
 
 

Thursday, April 20, 2023

Six Fiction Elements of Writing a Short Story

Six Fiction Elements of Writing a Short Story

 

Six Fiction Elements of Writing a Short Story

 

What Is a Short Story?

A short story is a work of short, narrative prose that is usually centered around one single event. It is limited in scope and has an introduction, body, and conclusion. Although a short story has much in common with a novel, it is written with much greater precision. Any time you write a short story of fiction or an essay on short fiction, the following guide and questions may help you.

Once you examine these narrative elements, you want to look for PATTERNS, or MOTIFS, in the work.  Pay attention to words & images that are related

Setting

Setting is a description of where and when the story takes place. In a short story there are fewer settings compared to a novel. The time is more limited. Ask yourself the following questions:

  • How is the setting created? Consider geography, weather, time of day, social conditions, etc.
  • What role does setting play in the story? Is it an important part of the plot or theme? Or is it just a backdrop against which the action takes place?
  • Does the setting change? If so, how?

Study the time period, which is also part of the setting, and ask yourself the following:

  • Who is the story written for?
  • Does it take place in the present, the past, or the future?
  • How does the time period affect the language, atmosphere or social circumstances of the short story?

Characterization

Characterization deals with how the characters in the story are described. In short stories there are usually fewer characters compared to a novel. They usually focus on one central character or protagonist. Ask yourself the following:

  • Who is the main character?
  • Who or what is the antagonist?
  • Are the main character and other characters described through dialogue – by the way they speak (dialect or slang for instance)?
  • Has the you described the characters by physical appearance, thoughts and feelings, and interaction (the way they act towards others)?
  • Are they static characters who do not change?
  • Are they dynamic characters who change?
  • What type of characters are they? What qualities stand out? Are they stereotypes?
  • Are the characters believable?
  • Do the characters symbolize something?

Plot and Structure

The plot is the main sequence of events that make up the story. In short stories the plot is usually centered around one experience or significant moment. Consider the following questions:

  • What is the most important event?
  • How will the plot be structured? Is it linear, chronological or does it move around?
  • Is the plot believable?

CONFLICT:  Conflict or tension is usually the heart of the short story and is related to the main character. In a short story there is usually one main struggle.

  • How would you describe the main conflict?
  • Is it an internal conflict within the character?
  • Is it an external conflict caused by the surroundings or environment the main character finds himself/herself in?

CLIMAX:  The climax is the point of greatest tension or intensity in the short story. It can also be the point where events take a major turn as the story races towards its conclusion.

  • When does the climax take place?

RESOLUTION:  The resolution is the end of the story. It focuses on how the conflict is ultimately resolved.

  • Are the closing sentences significant? How does the end relate or connect to the opening?

Narrator and Point of View

The narrator is the person telling the story.  Consider this question: Are the narrator and the main character the same?

By point of view we mean from whose eyes the story is being told. Short stories tend to be told through one character’s point of view. The following are important questions to consider:

  • Who is the narrator or speaker in the story?
  • Does the author speak through the main character?
  • Is the story written in the first person “I” point of view?
  • Is the story written in a detached third person “he/she” point of view?
  • Is there an “all-knowing” third person who can reveal what all the characters are thinking and doing at all times and in all places?
  • Is the narrator trustworthy?

Style

The author’s style has to do with the his or her vocabulary, use of imagery, tone, or the feeling of the story. It has to do with the author’s attitude toward the subject. In some short stories the tone can be ironic, humorous, cold, or dramatic.

  • Is the language full of figurative language: metaphors, symbols, personification, etc.?
  • What images are used?
  • What is the tone or mood of the story?

Theme

The theme is built on a topic, such as death, hope, the American dream, etc. and how the topic affects the human condition, society, or life.  As a reader, focus on what the story is revealing about the topic.  The theme should be expressed as a statement, a general observination about human nature.

To help you write a thematic statement for your short story, consider the following:

  • What is the story about – its general topic(s) (IE:  money, wealth, death, etc.)?
  • How is the topic developed? (Consider how characters change, symbols, climax, etc.)
  • Do you notice any patterns in imagery, diction, etc.?
  • Does the title have any significance?
  • Does the narrator or character include any statement(s) that reveals a theme or observation?

What a theme is NOT:

  • a word or phrase (topic or subject)
  • a command
  • a judgment

To help you construct the thematic statement, make a list of important images, topics, etc. found in the text.  Try to create a statement that includes the words in your list.

Also see:

Wednesday, April 19, 2023

Kettle Logic by Randy Ingermanson | Advanced Fiction Writing

Advanced Fiction Writing by Randy Ingermanson

 

Kettle Logic

 

by Randy Ingermanson 

 

Advanced Fiction Writing


I’m always on the lookout for ways to add conflict into fiction in a natural way. This month, I’ll look at a beautiful way to throw conflict into a story. It’s a method you’ve seen often in real life.

I learned this method from Seth Godin, who blogged recently on the subject of “kettle logic.”

I had never heard of kettle logic until I read Seth’s article, but I’d definitely seen it. Hundreds of times.

What is kettle logic? It’s a method of defending yourself by using contradictory claims.

An Example of Kettle Logic

It’s called kettle logic because of the example Sigmund Freud used to illustrate it.

A man was accused by his neighbor of returning a borrowed kettle in damaged condition.

The man defended himself this way:

a) I didn’t borrow your kettle.

b) When I borrowed it, the kettle was already damaged.

c) When I returned it, the kettle was in perfect condition.

Now, at most one of these defenses could actually be true. Because (a) is inconsistent with (b). And (b) is inconsistent with (c). And (c) is inconsistent with (a).

Why Would Anyone Use Kettle Logic?

My thinking on this is that nobody would use kettle logic if they were innocent. You only defend yourself with kettle logic because you’re guilty, and because you’re making up a defense on the fly. So you don’t have time to make it consistent. You keep throwing defenses at your accuser, hoping one of them will stick.

But the fact is that kettle logic does work, sort of. The accuser now has to refute all the defenses individually. But each time he does that, your defense gets stronger—because the inconsistencies in your defense start vanishing.

For example, if your neighbor attacks argument (a) by giving irrefutable proof that you did really borrow the kettle, then you can just admit that, yes, you borrowed the kettle, but now (a) is no longer inconsistent with (b) or (c) so you’ve removed two inconsistencies!

Kettle logic also works on an emotional level. When you throw a mass of inconsistent defenses at your accuser, he or she can’t help feeling irritated at the insult you’re making to their intelligence by offering up a massive pack of lies. And that irritation makes them less effective at pressing the case, because emotions interfere with logic.

So kettle logic can be a winning play in some cases. At the very least, it’s effective as a delaying tactic, and sometimes delay is all you need.

How to Fight Kettle Logic

How should the protagonist of your story deal with kettle logic? A winning strategy isn’t complicated. This is how you do it:

  1. Don’t get mad. Getting mad plays into the hands of the person using kettle logic.
  2. Point out that the defenses can’t all be true, and therefore the person using kettle logic is a liar and can’t be trusted.
  3. Insist that the person has to come up with a consistent defense. That forces them to admit to several lies. And it reduces your job because now you have fewer claims to refute.

Homework

  • Have you ever had someone use kettle logic on you? How did you feel when that happened? Can you use those feelings in your own fiction?
  • Have you ever used kettle logic on someone else? What were your reasons for using it? Did you know you were lying? If so, how did you feel when you realized you were lying? Can you use those reasons and those feelings in your own fiction?

 

About The Author

Randy Ingermanson
Randy Ingermanson is a theoretical physicist and the award-winning author of six novels. He has taught at numerous writing conferences over the years and publishes the free monthly Advanced Fiction Writing E-zine.
 
 

Tuesday, April 18, 2023

A Simon & Shuster Writing Editor Tells - "What I Expect When You Submit Your Manuscript"

A Simon & Shuster Writing Editor Tells - "What I Expect When You Submit Your Manuscript"

A Simon & Shuster Writing Editor Tells - "What I Expect When You Submit Your Manuscript"

Anica Mrose Rissi, Executive Editor for Simon Pulse, has created a checklist of things to do to help keep your manuscript from being rejected.

  • Revise, revise, revise! I don't want to read your first draft, ever. (Tip: Your novel isn't ready to send me until you can describe it in one sentence.)
  • Start with conflict and tension to raise questions, arouse curiosity, and (like musical dissonance) create the need for resolution.
  • Start with the story you're telling, not with the backstory.
  • Throw people directly into a conflict and let her get to know your characters through their actions. (Yes, this is another way of saying, "Show, don't tell.")
  • Give people something to wonder about and a sense of where the story is going—of what's at stake.
  • Avoid explaining too much too soon. Don't be obvious. Trust people. Trust your characters. Trust your writing. If you find that long chunks of your story need to include long explanations, go back in and write those chunks better, until the story explains itself.
  • Make sure your story has both a plot arc and an emotional arc. Cross internal conflict with external conflict. Give your characters moral dilemma, and force them to deal with the consequences of their choices.
  • Read your dialogue aloud. When revising, ask yourself, "What is the point behind this dialogue?" Make every scene and every sentence count. You should also be asking, "What's the point of the sentence?" What is the point of this scene?"
  • Use adjectives, adverbs and dialogue tags only sparingly. Make sure your details matter.

    (Writer's Digest

 

Also see:

Monday, April 17, 2023

A Quick Note on Writing Stream of Consciousness Fiction for the Novice Writer by Ryker J. Phoenix

 

A Quick Note on Writing Stream of Consciousness Fiction for the Novice Writer by Ryker J. Phoenix

 

 A Quick Note on Writing Stream of Consciousness Fiction for the Novice Writer

 

by Ryker J. Phoenix

 

Stream of consciousness is a narrative style that tries to capture a character’s thought process in a realistic way. It’s an interior monologue, but it’s also more than that. Because it’s mimicking the non-linear way our brains work, stream-of-consciousness narration includes a lot of free association, looping repetitions, sensory observations, and strange (or even nonexistent) punctuation and syntax—all of which helps us to better understand a character’s psychological state and worldview. It’s meant to feel like you have dipped into the stream of the character’s consciousness—or like you’re a fly on the wall of their mind.

Authors who use this technique are aiming for emotional and psychological truth: they want to show a snapshot of how the brain actually moves from one place to the next. Thought isn’t linear, these authors point out; we don’t really think in logical, well-organized, or even complete sentences.

 Here are some tips on how to write stream of consciousness fiction:

1. Choose a character and a situation: Choose a character that you understand and can see how their personality will play out in their thoughts, feelings and reactions to situations. Set the scene and the situation.

2. Use first person narrative: Write in the first person to create an intimacy between the reader and the character.

3. Don’t filter the thoughts: In stream of consciousness, there is no filter. Every thought that a character has will be expressed on the page. Avoid editing or correcting the thoughts of your character to maintain the realism.

4. Focus on their thoughts: Stream of consciousness is all about thoughts so focus the description on your character’s innermost thoughts and their feelings rather than actions or dialogue.

5. Use repetition and the senses: Repetition is often used in stream of consciousness writing, as is describing the senses experienced by the character - what can they see, smell, hear, touch etc.

6. Include flashback: Stream of consciousness is like a memory or a dream. It may be helpful to include flashbacks, so the reader can understand the character better.

7. Use punctuation sparingly: Using stream of consciousness means following the way someone thinks, so punctuation will be more scarce. You may go without full stops or commas if the thoughts are a long series of impressions or ideas.

8. Arrange the text in an organic way: Allow the text to flow organically. There is no need for a linear plot or storyline, but the text should be divided into paragraphs or sections for readability.

 In conclusion, stream of consciousness is a literary technique which involves following the random, unfiltered thoughts and emotions of a character in real-time.

Also see:

 

 More Quick Notes for the Novice Writer